Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 4 de 4
Filter
Add filters








Language
Year range
1.
Journal of Shanghai Jiaotong University(Medical Science) ; (12): 973-977, 2017.
Article in Chinese | WPRIM | ID: wpr-611633

ABSTRACT

Objective·To analyze high-risk factors of infection of multidrug resistance Klebsiellapneumonia (MDR-Kpn) and difference of therapeutic effects for different treatments.Methods·One hundred and ten MDR-Kpn strains were collected from a hospital.K-B slip diffusion method was utilized to detect the drug susceptibility of all the strains.Based on electronic medical records system,MDR-Kpn infected group included 51 patients and control group was picked out,including 51 patients as well (byl:1 ratio basing on the infected group according to the rules of under the same department,similar basic disease and all the patients in the control group isolated with the strain of Kpn).Thirty-nine clinical information of MDR-Kpn infected and control groups are collected to make single-factor analysis of high risk factors of the infection with MDR-Kpn.Multi-factor analysis was utilized between MDR-Kpn infected and control groups.The lasting time of different antibiotics used in MDR-Kpn infected patients were made statistics between effective and inefficacy patients.Results·Drug susceptibility test showed that sulfonamide,phosphonomycin and amikacin,were the three most sensitive antibiotics for 110 MDR-Kpn strains.12 clinical information,such as blood transfusion、sputum suction、invasive ventilation were all high-risk factors for the infection of MDR-Kpn (P<0.05).The lasting time during with carbapenems (P=0.025) was statistically different between effective (n=28)and non-effective group (n=23) of MDR-Kpn infection patients.Conclusion·Controlling and eliminating high-risk factors do help to protect and decrease the infection of MDR-Kpn.Using carbapenems correctly has great influence on prognosis.

2.
China Pharmacy ; (12)2005.
Article in Chinese | WPRIM | ID: wpr-525217

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE:To probe into the economic-effectiveness of different therapeutic schemes in the treatment of lower respiratory tract infections(LRTI).METHODS:86cases of LRTI were randomly divided into 2 groups:Group A received intravenous cefuroxime sodium while Group B received intravenous cefuroxime sodium and oral cefuroxime axetil sequential therapy.Cost-effectiveness of the 2 schemes was analyzed.RESULTS:The costs of the 2 therapeutic schemes were 677.60 yuan and 439.58 yuan(P0.05)respectively;the cost-effectiveness ratio of the 2 were 7.67 and 5.11 respectively.CONCLUSION:Scheme B was better than Scheme A in the treatment of lower respiratory tract infection.

3.
China Pharmacy ; (12)2001.
Article in Chinese | WPRIM | ID: wpr-527838

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE:To compare the cost-effectiveness of3therapeutic schemes on acute cerebral infarction(ACI).METHODS:A total of123patients with ACI were ascribed to receive sodium ozagrel injection(shemeⅠ),ginkgo leaf extract(GLE)and dipyridamole injection(schemeⅡ)and sodium ozagrel injection plus ginkgo leaf injection(schemeⅢ),the cost-effectiveness analyses of3groups were conducted using pharmacoeconomics method.RESULTS:The costs for the3schemes were9766.51yuan,5562.22yuan and8273.05yuan,respectively;The effective rates were36.84%,32.50%and71.11%,respectively;The cost-effectiveness ratios of3were265.11,171.15and116.34,respectively.CONCLUSION:SchemeⅢis preferable among3schemes.

4.
China Pharmacy ; (12)1991.
Article in Chinese | WPRIM | ID: wpr-533342

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE:To evaluate the cost-effectiveness of 3 therapeutic schemes in the treatment of Parkinson's disease (PD). METHODS:A total of 94 PD cases were randomly assigned into 3 groups:Group A (Benserazide tablets +carbidopa and Levodopa controlled release tablets),Group B (Benserazide tablets+Carbidopa and Levodopa controlled release tablets+Selegiline tablets) and Group C (Benserazide tablets+Carbidopa and Levodopa controlled release tablets+Entacapone tablets). After treatment for 8 weeks,the cost-effectiveness analysis were conducted for all the 3 groups. RESULTS:For Group A,B and C,the costs were 448.78,803.89,1 559.89 yuan,respectively; the total effective rates were 56.67%,83.33% and 85.71%,respectively; the cost-effectiveness ratios were 791.92,964.71,1 819.96,respectively. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratios of Group B and C were 1 332.00 and 3 826.14,respectively as against Group A. CONCLUSION:Group B is preferable for PD among the 3 groups.

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL